Read AI turns meetings into measurement: transcripts, summaries, and participant analytics like talk time, engagement, and sentiment. Intriq measures nothing and scores nobody. It keeps the things people told you, attached to them, so you have them before the next conversation.
See the comparison ↓Verdict
Choose Read AI if you want meetings instrumented: recordings, summaries, and analytics across a team, integrated with the rest of your stack. Choose Intriq if you would rather remember what someone said than know how they scored, and if you want that memory private and organized by person.
“What’s Sarah’s rabbit called again?”
Side by side
| Criterion | Recommended Intriq |  Read AI |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Intriq Private relationship memory app | Read AI AI meeting assistant with participant and engagement analytics |
| Primary platform | Intriq Native apps for iPhone and Android | Read AI Meeting bot and integrations across Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet |
| Core workflow | Intriq Capture a note, organize it around the person, brief yourself before the next conversation | Read AI The assistant joins the meeting, records it, and reports on what happened and how people behaved |
| What it keeps about a person | Intriq What they told you, in your own words, accumulating over years | Read AI Per-meeting metrics such as talk time, engagement, and sentiment |
| Capture method | Intriq Records the conversation you start on the iPhone or Apple Watch, or takes a quick note afterwards; nothing joins your calls | Read AI Records and transcribes the meeting, often joining automatically from the calendar |
| AI | Intriq Grounded recall from your saved notes only; refuses to invent | Read AI Summaries, action items, sentiment and engagement scoring, cross-meeting search |
| Privacy posture | Intriq Records only when you start it; kept recordings live in a private single-user account, and notes are private to you, synced to your account | Read AI Recordings, transcripts, and analytics stored in the cloud and visible across the workspace |
| Pricing | Intriq Free plan; optional paid plans; not per seat | Read AI Free tier of 5 meetings a month; Pro around $19.75 per user a month; Enterprise tiers above that |
| Best fit | Intriq Remembering people across scattered conversations | Read AI Teams that want meetings measured and searchable |
Ask Mira
Mira can look back through your notes when a name slips your mind.
Hannah Cole VP Marketing
“…asked for an intro to someone in fintech comms…”
Devon Marsh Ops director
“…wanted the onboarding deck rewritten for his team…”
Yusuf Kaya Founder
“…still waiting on the pricing benchmark I promised…”
Read AI is ambitious in a way most notetakers are not. Alongside transcripts and summaries it reports on the meeting itself: who spoke and for how long, how engaged people seemed, how the sentiment moved. It connects across Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet, and searches across everything it has collected.
For an organization trying to understand its own meeting culture, or a manager who wants a view of calls they were not on, that instrumentation is real and useful. Nothing in Intriq competes with it, because Intriq is not measuring anything.
Read AI's participant analytics are scoped to the meeting they came from. You can learn that someone spoke for 40 percent of Tuesday's call and that sentiment read positive. That is a fact about a meeting, not about a person, and it expires almost immediately.
What you actually need before seeing someone again is different in kind: that they are moving their team in the spring, that their co-founder makes the final call, that they asked you for an introduction six months ago and you never made it. Read AI has no place to keep that, because it is not something a meeting can be scored on. Intriq is built entirely around that kind of fact.
There is also a question of posture. Analytics about how colleagues perform in meetings is a category some people are glad to have and others find uncomfortable, and where you land on that is a legitimate matter of taste rather than something to be argued out of.
Intriq takes the other route by design. It holds only what you chose to record or write down, it is single-user, and it never rates anyone. The record is your own memory made durable, which is a smaller claim than analytics and a more comfortable one to hold about the people you work with.
Scenarios
Manager assessing meeting culture across a team
Wants to know whether meetings are balanced, who is dominating discussion, and how engagement trends across recurring calls.
Best fit: Read AI . This is exactly what Read AI's analytics are for. Intriq collects no metrics and cannot answer it.
Investor tracking founders over years
Meets the same founders across calls, dinners, and conferences over several years, and needs the accumulated read on each one before the next conversation.
Best fit: Intriq . The unit is the person over years, not the meeting. Read AI's per-meeting scoring does not accumulate into a picture of an individual.
Enterprise standardizing on one meeting stack
Needs recordings, transcripts, integrations, and admin controls across hundreds of seats, with search over everything the company has discussed.
Best fit: Read AI . That is an enterprise meeting-infrastructure purchase. Intriq is a single-user app with no admin layer.
Read AI user who wants a private layer
Has full analytics on every internal call but nowhere to record the candid observation that a client's real objection is political rather than technical.
Best fit: Either Read AI or Intriq, depending on emphasis . Keep Read AI for the instrumented meeting record; add Intriq for the private, per-person notes that should never sit in a shared workspace.
At a glance
Strengths
Tradeoffs
Strengths
Tradeoffs
When Read AI is the better fit
Read AI is the better choice when meetings are the thing you want to understand and improve: who talks, how engaged people are, what was decided, searchable across a team. If you are buying meeting infrastructure for an organization, Intriq is not in that market at all.
When Intriq is the better fit
Intriq is the better choice when you want a durable, private memory of people rather than instrumentation of meetings, when the conversations that matter are not all on a call, and when you would rather nothing joined your meetings or rated anybody. It is single-user, records only when you start it, and everything is filed to the person.
Common questions
If the job is remembering people, yes. Intriq records the conversations you start on your iPhone and remembers the people in them. It does not join, transcribe, or analyze Zoom, Teams, or Google Meet calls, so for meeting infrastructure Read AI is the tool.
No, and deliberately not. Intriq stores what you recorded or wrote about a person and recalls it, grounded in that. It does not score anyone on talk time, engagement, charisma, or sentiment, and it does not infer anything about people beyond what you kept.
No. There is no bot and no calendar integration that puts anything into a call. Intriq is only ever used by you: it records when you start it on your own phone, or you write something down after a conversation.
No. Intriq is single-user with no workspace or admin layer, recordings live in your own private account, and notes are private to you. That is a structural difference from a team meeting-analytics product, where recordings and reports are visible beyond the participants.
Yes. Read AI covers the instrumented record of your meetings for the organization. Intriq holds the private per-person memory across those meetings and the many conversations that never appear on a calendar.
Intriq, because that is the entire product. Read AI can retrieve the transcript of the meeting if you remember roughly when it happened. Intriq assembles what you know about that client on their profile, so you do not need to remember which meeting it came from.
Free plan, no credit card. Capture notes in plain English, by typing or by voice, and recall the context before the next conversation.