Compare apps

Intriq vs tl;dv

Choose tl;dv for recording video calls and reviewing them across a team. Intriq records and summarizes conversations you start on iPhone or Apple Watch, then organizes the context you keep around people. It does not join Zoom, Meet or Teams calls with a bot.

See the comparison ↓

Verdict

Choose tl;dv if the meeting is the asset: recorded calls, transcripts, coaching, and conversation intelligence shared across a revenue team. Choose Intriq if the person is the asset, and what you need is a private memory that spans every conversation including the ones that never happened on a call.

Coffee with Sarah, a week later.

“What’s Sarah’s rabbit called again?”

Mira Pip. The one who chewed her charger.
Try the conversation

Side by side

Intriq vs tl;dv at a glance

Criterion Recommended Intriq tl;dv
Category Intriq Private relationship memory app tl;dv AI meeting recorder with sales conversation intelligence
Primary platform Intriq Native apps for iPhone and Android tl;dv Browser extension, desktop app, and meeting bot for Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams
Core workflow Intriq Capture a note, organize it around the person, brief yourself before the next conversation tl;dv Record the call, transcribe it, summarize it, route it to the CRM and the team
Who it is for Intriq One person, for their own memory tl;dv Revenue teams; priced per seat with team analytics and coaching
Capture method Intriq Records the conversation you start on the iPhone or Apple Watch, or takes a quick note afterwards; nothing joins your calls tl;dv Records the call itself, either with a visible bot or from the desktop app
AI Intriq Grounded recall from your saved notes only; refuses to invent tl;dv Summaries, custom prompts, coaching scorecards, and conversation analytics
Privacy posture Intriq Records only when you start it; kept recordings live in a private single-user account, and notes are private to you, synced to your account tl;dv Call recordings and transcripts stored in the cloud and shared with your team
Pricing Intriq Free plan; optional paid plans; not per seat tl;dv Free plan with limited AI summaries; Pro around $18 per user a month; Business around $59 per user a month
Best fit Intriq Remembering people across scattered conversations tl;dv Sales teams reviewing and coaching recorded calls

Ask Mira

When a name slips your mind.

Mira can look back through your notes when a name slips your mind.

Who did I meet at the conference that I should follow up with?

3 people match · grounded in your notes

  • Ruth Adeyemi COO, Marchant

    “…asked me to send the security overview in September…”

    Note · Jun
  • Stefan Lindqvist Angel investor

    “…invests only after seeing two quarters of retention…”

    Note · Jun
  • Aisha Rahman Head of Ops

    “…introduced me to her old colleague at Vantage…”

    Note · Jun
More questions to try
Gather people by a shared interest
  • Who likes golf?
  • Anyone into tennis?
  • Who plays golf and has pets?
Find the right introduction
  • Who can introduce me to someone at Mastercard?
  • Who do I know from Microsoft?
Reconnect before it goes cold
  • Who haven't I talked to in 3 months?
  • Which dormant relationships could become pipeline?
Filter with real logic
  • Who works in healthcare or AI?
  • Who studied at UCLA?

What tl;dv does well

tl;dv is a serious meeting-recording product with real depth for revenue teams. It records Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams, transcribes in a long list of languages, produces summaries against your own prompts, and pushes the result into HubSpot, Salesforce, or Pipedrive so nobody has to type up the call.

The layer above that is where it earns its price: coaching scorecards, talk-time and conversation analytics, and the ability for a manager to review calls they were not on. If you run a sales team and want to know how your reps actually handle objections, that is the product, and Intriq is not competing for the job.

What Intriq does differently

Intriq is built for one person and never attaches to a call. There is no bot and no desktop capture. When a conversation is worth recording, you start it on your iPhone or Apple Watch, and Intriq summarizes it and files what you keep to the people in it rather than to the calendar entry. When it is not, you capture the line worth keeping afterwards, and it lands in the same place.

The practical consequence is coverage. tl;dv knows about the conversations that happened on a call with software running. Most of what you learn about people does not happen there: it happens at the dinner, in the corridor, on the walk to the station, at the conference badge table. Intriq is built for those conversations and the minute afterwards.

The team asset and the personal one

tl;dv's output belongs to the company. That is a design choice, not a criticism: recordings are shared, coachable, and CRM-bound, because a revenue team needs one version of what happened. It is priced per seat for the same reason.

Intriq's output belongs to you. It is single-user by design, and it travels with you when you change jobs, which a CRM record does not. That also makes it the right home for the candid observation you would never put in a shared call recording: who really makes the decision, what they are worried about, why the timeline slipped. Those notes are useful precisely because they are private.

Scenarios

Which tool fits which job

Sales manager coaching a team of reps

Needs to review calls they did not attend, score how objections were handled, and make sure the CRM reflects what was actually said on each opportunity.

Best fit: tl;dv . This is tl;dv's core job: recorded calls, coaching scorecards, and CRM sync across a team. Intriq is single-user and never joins a call.

Solo consultant with a referral-driven practice

Wins work through a network of past clients and introducers met at dinners, conferences, and the occasional call. Has no team, no CRM, and no interest in paying per seat.

Best fit: Intriq . The value is a private per-person memory across mostly off-call conversations, which a team call-recorder neither captures nor is priced for.

Founder running discovery calls

Wants an accurate record of thirty customer calls to pull quotes and patterns from, and to share the raw material with two colleagues.

Best fit: tl;dv . Verbatim transcripts of scheduled calls, shared with colleagues, is exactly what a recorder is for.

Account lead who already runs tl;dv

Has every client call recorded and summarized, but still walks into the quarterly review unable to remember that the client's counterpart changed roles and their daughter just started university.

Best fit: Either tl;dv or Intriq, depending on emphasis . Keep tl;dv for the call record the team needs; add Intriq for the private per-person memory that spans the calls and the conversations around them.

At a glance

Strengths and tradeoffs

Intriq

Strengths

  • Single-user and private by design; the memory is yours and moves with you
  • Nothing records unless you start it, so nothing is capturing the room by default
  • Person-centered memory that compounds across every conversation
  • Covers in-person and informal conversations that never touch a call
  • Private, single-user
  • Not priced per seat

Tradeoffs

  • Does not join or record Zoom, Meet, or Teams calls
  • No CRM integrations
  • No team sharing, coaching, or conversation analytics
  • You start each recording or note yourself

tl;dv

Strengths

  • Records and transcribes Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams reliably
  • Bot-free desktop capture as well as a meeting bot
  • Deep CRM integrations and custom AI summary prompts
  • Coaching scorecards and conversation analytics for teams
  • Generous free tier for recording and transcription

Tradeoffs

  • Meeting-centered; no durable memory of a person across conversations
  • Only sees conversations that happen on a supported call
  • Recordings and transcripts live in the cloud and are shared with the team
  • Per-seat pricing aimed at revenue teams, not individuals
  • Recording still requires managing consent with the other participants

When tl;dv is the better fit

tl;dv is the better choice when the recording is the deliverable and other people need it: sales teams coaching reps, founders pulling quotes from discovery calls, anyone who needs the call in the CRM without typing it up. It is also the better choice when verbatim transcripts of video calls need to be shared across a team.

When Intriq is the better fit

Intriq is the better choice when you are one person trying to remember people rather than archive meetings, when most of what matters is said away from a scheduled call, and when the notes you want to keep are ones you would never put in a shared recording. Nothing records unless you start it, nothing is per seat, and the memory stays yours.

Common questions

Intriq vs tl;dv FAQ

Is Intriq a tl;dv alternative?

If what you want is to remember people, yes. Intriq records the conversations you start on your iPhone and files them, with your notes, under the people in them. If you want Zoom, Meet, or Teams calls recorded, transcribed, and shared with a team, tl;dv is the tool for that; Intriq never joins a call and has no CRM integrations.

Does Intriq record my meetings like tl;dv does?

No. There is no bot and no desktop capture, and Intriq never attaches to a call. When you want a recording, you start one on your iPhone or Apple Watch for the conversation in front of you, and Intriq transcribes and summarizes it and files what you keep under the people in it. Otherwise you capture the one line worth keeping afterwards, and it is filed to the person.

tl;dv already has a bot-free desktop app, so why Intriq?

Bot-free is about visibility, not recording. tl;dv's desktop app still captures the call audio; it just does not announce itself with an avatar in the participant list. Intriq never attaches to your calls at all, which is a different thing: the only audio it holds is a recording you chose to start on your phone. It also covers the in-person conversations no call recorder sees.

Can I use tl;dv and Intriq together?

Yes, and for a lot of people that is the right setup. tl;dv holds the call record your team needs. Intriq holds the private, per-person memory that spans those calls plus every dinner, corridor conversation, and introduction that never appeared on a calendar.

Is Intriq cheaper than tl;dv?

They are priced for different things. tl;dv is per seat, around $18 per user a month on Pro and around $59 on Business, because it is sold to teams. Intriq has a free plan and optional paid plans for one person, and there are no seats to buy.

Which is more private?

Intriq, for notes about people. tl;dv stores call recordings and transcripts in the cloud and shares them with your team, which is exactly what a team tool should do. Intriq is single-user with nothing shared: it records only when you start it, keeps recordings in your own private account, and keeps notes private to you, which is the posture you want for candid observations.

Relationship memory on iPhone and Android.

Free plan, no credit card. Capture notes in plain English, by typing or by voice, and recall the context before the next conversation.

Meet Mira.

Scan with your phone or choose your store.

App Store Google Play

Free to start.